It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Climate Sensitivity

Climate sensitivity refers to the amount the temperature of the atmosphere is expected to rise as with a doubling of CO2 in the air. For background have a look at this 2008 article.


Climate alarmists have been downgrading their estimates since the first wildly ‘settled science’ papers were first published on the subject.


Two recent papers are stirring a re-look at the whole issue.






Respected climatologist Judith Curry has weighed in on the recent news.




Some papers and articles which address the subject have been taken from the C3headlines.com archives.
In the case of the IPCC, they published a flat-out fear-mongering sensitivity that in computer simulations would produce a temperature increase of +6.4°C (pink line) by 2100AD, if CO2 emissions were not stabilized. This incredibly high computer output was designed to scare policymakers and the mainstream media into action.
Scientists have learned that fear mongering can loosen the purse strings of their political overlords. Nothing like some scare tactics to fatten the funding. What is a little exaggeration between friends? Enjoy the ride until the scare is recognized for the bogus issue it is.

Natural internal variability: sensitivity and attribution | Climate Etc.








No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive