It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Is it Fraud and Deceit to Tell the Truth

Is It Fraud and Deceit to Tell the Truth?


Lieu has also been a huge proponent of prosecuting companies he sees as funding skeptics to protect their financial interests. He recently sent a letter to California Attorney General Kamala Harris, urging her to keep investigating Exxon and its allies because freedom of speech “is not designed to protect fraud and deceit.”


If a man made climate change skeptic points out that temperatures are not rising as fast as climate alarmists have predicted is that an example of Fraud and Deceit?

If a man made climate change doubter points out that the Global Climate Models suggest that temperatures should be warmer than we currently experience is that ‘Fraud and Deceit’?

Or is it exposure of  Fraud and Deceit?

If a man made climate skeptic points out that increases in extreme weather like hurricanes and tornadoes are not happening as CO2 has risen unabated in the atmosphere would that be Fraud and Deceit?

Or would it be exposure of alarmist Fraud and Deceit?

If a man made climate skeptic points out that Antarctica is GAINING ice mass in contradiction to the alarmist prediction is that an example of Fraud and Deceit?

If a man made climate skeptic points out that heatwaves are less frequent now than in the past even as CO2 has continued to rise unabated in our atmosphere would that be an example of Fraud and Deceit?

If a man made climate skeptic points out that CO2 levels have been 5 to 20 times as high as we currently experience(400 ppm) for most of the last 600 million years and that there was no tipping point, no runaway global warming would that be an example of Fraud and Deceit?

After learning that fact who would continue to believe that CO2 is dangerous? Is it an example of Fraud and Deceit to ask that question? The data do NOT support the CAGW claim. It is past time DEMS admitted it.

If a climate skeptic points out the following facts about carbon dioxide(CO2) would that be an example of Fraud and Deceit?

Do we owe CO2 an apology?

CO2, an invisible trace gas essential to life on Earth, is plant food and if feeding the flora is a dangerous transformation of life on this planet my fruits and veggies are in its debt. We exhale CO2 and help to feed the flora. In return they slip us oxygen of which we are rather fond in a mutually beneficial and amicable symbiotic relationship. From this evil comes?

Future generations will look back at this time and wonder how so many people could be taken in by the ‘hate fossil fuel’ hysteria. It will be the focus of Phd studies on how people could fall for the delusion that CO2 is a toxic pollutant. We exhale it people. It is in your lungs in concentrations approaching 40,000 ppm. How are you feeling? It is in the ambient air at 400 ppm and has been as high as 8000 ppm within the last 570 million years. We are here. There was no tipping point no runaway global warming beyond which the planet became uninhabitable.

Plants grow better, stronger, faster because of the increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.

In concluding, the U.S. research team declares that "from this remarkable 30-year archive of satellite imagery, we thus see evidence of a greening trend," which clearly indicates that the net result of the climatic and physiological effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on Earth's terrestrial plant life has in the mean been decidedly beneficial.

Apart from that CO2 has no redeeming features

We need to stop all activities aimed at decreasing human emissions of CO2.

CO2 is clean and  green. CO2 is a friend with BENEFITS. Must you eat? Then the social BENEFITS of CO2 are PRICELESS. We need more of it not less. The globe is greening. This is a sign that CO2 is benign. CO2 has been exhaled during the creation of this post. No living thing was harmed. Some even liked it. Let the plants dance.

Perhaps DEMS pass laws because they are afraid the truth will spoil their agenda.

Truth.png

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive