Global Climate Models(GCMs) have become the scientific equivalent of a seer peering into his crystal ball and reporting on the future. GCMs have been designed with CO2 in the lead role. The heat trapping GreenHouse Gas molecules drive the GCMs to produce a warmer, wetter and drier world. Did you catch the contradiction there? It is built into the computer code. But the scenarios from the ‘runs’ of the GCMs have come into conflict with the entity who has the only opinion that counts: Mother Nature.
CO2 increases do not correlate with temperature gyrations over either the short or long term.
As CO2 rises Gaia surprises with temperatures in stasis for the last 18 years. Theory busted. Can climate scientists be trusted?
A warmer world is supposed to cause more evaporation from the oceans which should result in higher relative humidity and greater precipitation. More floods should be expected with all the additional rain. Neither have occurred.
A warmer world is also supposed to be a drier world with more drought of longer length and greater severity. This should create difficulties for crops. Forest fires are supposed to be more prevalent under such conditions.
The GCms predict a ‘hot spot’ should be observed in the troposphere about 10km in altitude. Alas, such is not the case. Are the GHGs napping?
Polar amplification is supposed to kick in as the world warms and make the our polar regions the fastest warming places on Earth. CO2 is not trapping the heat at the South Pole.
The oceans are supposed to become less basic and more acidic as CO2 increases in the atmosphere. A new study has cast doubt on that hypothesis.
As CO2 rises Gaia surprises not with accelerating sea level rise from melting polar ice caps and glaciers but a slowdown in the rise as if someone is turning off the faucet in our oceanic bathtub.
“The sea level rise over the past ~200 years shows no evidence of acceleration, which is necessary to assume a man-made influence. Sea level rise instead decelerated over the 20th century, decelerated 31% since 2002 and decelerated 44% since 2004 to less than 7 inches per century. There is no evidence of an acceleration of sea level rise, and therefore no evidence of any man-made effect on sea levels. Sea level rise is primarily a local phenomenon related to land subsidence, not CO2 levels. Therefore, areas with groundwater depletion and land subsidence have much higher rates of relative sea level rise, but this has absolutely nothing to do with man-made CO2.”
And the man who raised the global warming alarm in 1988, how are his predictions doing against the reality of Mother Nature? Not well. Twenty-five years of failure.
The GCM failures continue to pile up. When your theory fails this badly what conclusion should be drawn from these data? We think that is obvious but you be the judge.
These are but a few of the investigations detailing the abject failure of the man made climate change hypothesis. If these studies don’t turn you into a skeptic about man made global warming due to the human emissions of CO2 then nothing will and we will leave you in your fantasy world. You do seem happy there.
CO2 is an invisible trace gas essential to life on Earth. It has been exhaled during the completion of this post. No living thing was harmed. Some even liked it.
The IPCC models have been invalidated and we owe CO2 an apology.
No comments:
Post a Comment