Misrepresenting Denialism

‘Dangerously in denial on climate change’ – ‘Denialism’ is ‘a symptom of a much greater anti-intellectual, anti-science epidemic’

‘Is it time to take science out of the climate change debate?’

NY Mag: Climate ‘Denialism Should Disqualify Anyone From Office’

While the MSM is trying to DENY that Mother Nature does not support their pet global warming meme ....

NOAA, NASA lied on ‘warmest’ records – ‘No new record was set’        

2014 Was Not the ‘Hottest Year on Record’. So Why Did NASA Claim It Was?

Is climate change really that dangerous? Predictions are ‘greatly exaggerated’, claims study        

Former UN IPCC & MIT scientist Lindzen compares ‘climate alarmists’ to religious fanatics        

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer on AGW: ‘Data has been manipulated, honest scientific debate has been stifled, educational institutions have been turned into brain-washing centers for the cause’        

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: ‘The problem is Obama is listening to scientists that are either playing politics with their expertise, or responding to a political mandate’        

Exile and dissent are emerging in America

No Warming In Antarctica During Satellite Record – Since 1979        

UK mortuaries overflowing as freezing weather causes rise in deaths

Space scientist fears return of ‘mini ice age’        

The real DENIERS are those who are too busy throwing around the term to notice that Mother Nature does not support their cherished theory. They prefer to remain in DENIAL of reality.

And then they get ANGRY about it and call for the heads of skeptics.

Soon we will have BARGAINING, the next step in the grieving process when you lose your cherished theory.

Could that have arrived with the willingness of alarmists to admit temperatures have failed to rise in tandem with CO2 emissions over the last 18 years? And to back off their ridiculous claim that 2014 was the warmest year since 1880? Perhaps the continual attempt to change the focus of the argument from global warming to climate change to anthropogenic climate disruption to expressing their feelings is a type of bargaining and an ass backwards way of admitting their arguments lack credence. Changing focus is an admission that the cherished theory is in trouble.

Next we will have DEPRESSION followed finally, we hope, by ACCEPTANCE.

If there is no agreement reached in Paris in 2015 will that produce the expected DEPRESSION?

Or is their need to express their feelings a sign that DEPRESSION is just around the corner? Is the need to commiserate a sign of depression?

Some say there are seven stages of grief with an upturn and ‘working through’ that follow DEPRESSION and precede ACCEPTANCE.

Fortunately there are support groups to help with the upturn and working through. Recovering alarmists can find a list of them at any popular skeptical web site.