It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Friday, January 9, 2015

Chief of the Deniers


So how is that going so far?

If we ASSUME that all additions of CO2 to the atmosphere since the industrial revolution are due to humans then we have added 4.5 times as much CO2 to the air in the last 60 years compared to the previous sixty. Shouldn’t we be seeing the negative effects of this tinkering with Nature?



And poverty?


The world attained the first Millennium Development Goal target—to cut the 1990 poverty rate in half by 2015—five years ahead of schedule, in 2010.

This means that, in 2011, just over one billion people lived on less than $1.25 a day, compared with 1.91 billion in 1990, and 1.93 billion in 1981

As the World Bank declares “Despite this progress, the number of people living in extreme poverty remains unacceptably high.”

Agreed. More development is needed in certain areas of the world like India, China and Africa. Just as the rise in CO2 is associated with reductions in poverty and hunger so too is it associated with increases in longevity and standard of living.

We might want to conclude that increases in CO2 from industrial activity is a measure of human progress not danger.

Is Pachauri denying these improvements in human well being?



No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive