It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Monday, August 19, 2013

POTUS Calls Mother Nature A Liar

Mother Nature calls the POTUS a denier.

With all the ad hominems flying among CAGW alarmists and skeptics is it any wonder that the truth is sacrificed on the altar of a political agenda(21). There is a lot at stake. Truth in science versus the government largesse gifted to green initiatives. Lots of green thrown at green plans could be lost if the opinion of Mother Nature is considered in the debate.

Hence CAGW skeptics are called deniers, flat earthers and anti-science in an attempt by alarmists to claim the moral and scientific high ground. Mis-characterize your opposition as stupid, backward, supporters of conspiracy theories and you condemn them with guilt by association. You disassociate yourself from them and present yourself as angelic. Verbal magic.

The POTUS goes on about the need to reduce  ‘carbon’, meaning, carbon dioxide pollution. Alarmists no longer say carbon dioxide or CO2 when talking about pollution. They want to associate carbon with evil and realize that people may be too smart to accept CO2 as a pollutant because they know that CO2 is plant food. It is harder to sell plant food as a pollutant but if they talk about carbon the association to something good like plant food is disconnected in the human mind. It is a marketing tool designed to win adherents to a political cause rather than an accurate representation of the real world thus betraying their angelic status. Substituting carbon for carbon dioxide is seen as a winning strategy and politics is all about winning. The truth be damned. It is no coincidence that science is about truth. Alarmists are all about marketing.

The POTUS has no time for climate change deniers and flat earthers. Does this mean he has no time for Mother Nature?

Mother Nature is going to make the POTUS resemble an idiot. She will have the POTUS look like he believes that too much human induced CO2 both warms and cools the planet. CO2 is bipolar like that. It can flip from its warming function to its cooling function depending on whether the weather is warming or cooling. No matter what the weather is doing it is CO2’s fault. And since we emit CO2 that makes it our fault. Pogo politics. As long as the blame can be pinned on the witches, er, humans, alarmists have a clear path to wreck the economy and make their crony capitalist  friends rich.

The POTUS does not care how stupid he appears. He will cite studies that support his viewpoint and ignore those that don’t. And yet, in science, all viewpoints are allowed on the table to be reconciled with contemporary theory. This is how science arrives at the truth about our world. It is the interaction between competing viewpoints from which the truth is distilled in science. In politics competing views are suppressed. Only the preferred one is allowed on the table.

The POTUS has subsidized green ‘solutions’ such as wind, solar and electric vehicles via grants, loans and subsidies to his campaign contributors. Many of them have simply taken the money and run folding their uneconomic businesses after a few months of qualifying operations. Others must continue to receive subsidies as they cannot compete in the marketplace without them. When the subsidies disappear so do the industries they spawned. Other governments in Europe have been finding out how expensive the subsidies can become and are now cutting back. Their gravy train is drying up while the POTUS continues on his merry way oblivious to the real world around him. The captain of the ship of state has lost his GPS.

The POTUS says the world is warming faster than expected while Mother Nature reports temperatures have flatlined for the last 17 years and have been decreasing for the last decade. Billions of dollars have been poured into Global Climate Models(GCMs) to simulate the workings of the climate. And the results have been less than stellar. The GCMs give a starring role to CO2 and overestimate its effect on the future climate. Mother Nature has her own idea as to what the average temperature of the Earth should be and she is tracking lower than the most optimistic GCM. It makes CO2 suspect as a main driver of climate change which in turn makes all the activities we have done to lower our CO2 emissions as totally unnecessary.

The POTUS says the weather is becoming more extreme as CO2 fills the air while Mother Nature shows him only three hurricanes in his first term - the lowest of any president. Is it surprising that this is not a talking point for the POTUS? Do you find it strange that the POTUS does not talk about the fact that Mother Nature has not sent a hurricane to Florida for over 7 years - the longest period of absence in the record? Do you find it strange that the POTUS does not talk about the fact that Mother Nature has not sent a major (cat3+) hurricane to the mainland of the US in over 7 years - an abnormally long time.

The POTUS tries to raise our fears by citing the forest fires raging in parts of the country without also putting them into context and reporting that Mother Nature’s pyrotechnics have been rather subdued as 2013 is one of the quietest seasons on record. Smokey the Bear is grateful.

The POTUS can rightfully lament, as do we all, the destruction in Moore, Oklahoma by a powerful tornado earlier this year but 2013 is also a quiet year for tornadoes. While all destructive storms are to be decried, from an historical context, Mother Nature has been extraordinarily kind to us by keeping her twisters to a minimum.

While extreme weather today may seem more costly it is because there are more of us and we have more stuff that can get in the path of a storm. But our improved technology, such as satellites and doppler radar, allow us more lead time to get out of the way so that the number of lives lost due to extreme weather is way down.

Mother Nature can be a powerful force for destruction. It is to be wished that some day we can give her something for her PMS( powerful monster storms) to calm her down. At this time we are at her mercy and can only adapt and rebuild after we take a hit.

Mother Nature is a CAGW denier. Obama is a reality denier. And Americans can tell the difference.





CO2 Bird Killer

h/t Tom Nelson



This year’s exceptionally cold spring is exacting a toll on many birds.
...
We can never blame any particular weather event, or any individual seasonal weather pattern, on climate change, but ironically, this freakishly cold spring is consistent with predictions for a steadily warming planet. Insurance companies are being squeezed by the huge upsurge in weather-related claims, but overall, people seem to feel either complacent or impotent to do anything about how much carbon we continue to squander. Some people have told me they’re just not going to worry about this sort of thing anymore because there’s nothing we can do about it anyway...Every distressed warbler I see reaffirms my commitment to protect these plucky little wanderers and the world we share.

We have no doubt that climate change can have a negative effect on animal populations. Darwin knew this a long time ago. He thought it essential to evolution.

Bolding is mine. Do people listen to themselves when they speak?

Let’s warm up to cool down. The cold will lead to warmth. Warmth produces cold. A is not-A.

Ok. And since increasing CO2 causes the world to warm therefore increasing CO2 also causes the world to grow cold. CO2 is bipolar.

CO2 is a magical gas. Left out of this scenario is the mechanism by which CO2 ‘decides’ to make it a warm or cold spring. Does it flip a coin? Is it PMS? We must know in order to make a successful prediction of future climate. Spring 2012 in the US was warm. Spring 2013 in the US was cold. Britain had a chilly and wet summer of 2012. In summer 2013 the Brits have experienced a heatwave. CO2 does it all.

CO2 is indecisive. Or it likes to experiment. What will it be like in 2014? We have no idea. But whatever weather we get the Global Climate Models(GCMs) predicted it and you are to blame. CO2 will decide when the time comes. Just look out your window. Whatever you see is what CO2 decided you should see.

We must reduce CO2 emissions to return CO2 to normal from its current psychotic state.

CO2 will trap heat if it damn well pleases and if it doesn’t it won’t. CO2 is a part time heat trapping gas. Like many in this economy it can’t get a full time position.
CO2 is fickle.

It had a perfect opportunity to trap the summertime assumed heat that caused the Arctic sea ice extent to reach a record low and it didn’t do it. We could have had a warm winter in 2012-2013 instead of the cold and snowy one we received. It had a perfect opportunity to trap the summer 2012 heat from the US drought and heatwave but it didn’t do it. All those triple digit temperature days wasted on CO2. All we got was a cold and snowy 2012-2013 winter and spring. CO2 didn’t do its job and animals and people lost their lives in the cold.

CO2, a heat trapping GHG, that can’t trap heat.

CO2, alarmists are counting on you. You are taxing their abilities to spin your behaviour in support of their political agenda. It would be so much easier if you were consistent from year to year.

Alarmists put you in charge of the climate and you let them down. People will stop believing the alarmists. People will begin to laugh at those who say CO2 is to blame for everything.

How can Al Gore continue to convince people of CAGW when you won’t trap the heat?

You may have to be replaced.

Ok, maybe not. What would become of the ‘settled science’? It might be harder to sell then.

You must trap the heat. It is the only way. Skeptics are becoming even more skeptical. Warmists are jumping ship to the SS Skeptic. Debates are happening. Horrors! The people will hear.

You have forced alarmists to become even more Apocalyptic, if that is possible.

You must live up to their billing for you. You are the star in the greatest drama the world has ever seen.

CO2 - it’s YOU. You are the ONE.

You must save us by destroying us. Destruction is Construction. Live it.

Wow. All that from the death of a few birds (RIP) due to cold weather. Like that hasn’t happened before.

We owe CO2 an apology.

CO2, a trace gas essential to life on Earth, is plant food. We exhale CO2 and help to feed the flora. In return they slip us oxygen of which we are rather fond in a mutually beneficial and amicable symbiotic relationship.

Apart from that CO2 has no redeeming features

We need to stop all activities aimed at decreasing human emissions of CO2.

CO2 is green. We need more of it not less. CO2 has been exhaled during the creation of this post. No living thing was harmed. Some even liked it. Let the plants dance.





Monday, July 29, 2013

The Idyllic Weather of the Past

Advocates for control over human emissions of CO2 often warn of the fearsome weather to descend upon us if we do not follow their prescription for reducing CO2 emissions. They warn of superstorms, floods, droughts and even blizzards as the world warms if we don’t succumb to their schemes to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels.

Each bad weather event is presented as a glimpse into the future.

But can the wailing warmists cannot point to a time in the past when the weather was not visiting terrible extremes upon us? Such a time of fluffy white clouds and gentle summer rain has never existed without the interruption of more severe weather. History is a witness to that.

And rising concentrations of CO2 in the air do not correlate with an increase in the frequency or severity of bad weather. Those who say it does display their ignorance of weather history.

Asking  warmists to what year they would like to return may help to open their eyes to the fact that nothing out of the ordinary is happening now that didn’t also occur in the past. They will also discover that current trends are in the opposite direction to that forecast for the future and this even as CO2 continues to increase in the atmosphere. CO2 is not the demon it has been made out to be. They can let the guilt and fear in them subside.

Climate changes continuously. When hasn’t the weather been weird?

On The Opinions of Experts

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman

[2006] ‘Humanity is sitting on a time bomb. If the vast majority of the world’s scientists are right, we have just 10 years to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet’s climate system into a tail-spin of epic destruction . . .”

There are three years to go on that one, Mr Gore. WIll we be on the Eve of Destruction? Based on the success rate of past apocalyptic prognostications from the ‘experts’ my inclination is not to worry. My money is on Dr Feynman.
Drought showed up in 2012 in Colorado and alarmist hysteria predicted shorter ski seasons
shorter ski seasons and less snow brought to Colorado by the winter of 2012-2013

Well, that didn’t happen as ….


The 1970 crystal ball was broken - experts fooled. Crystal ball recalled by The Wizard.Company.


Why does that one have a ring of familiarity to it?

We have similar scientific seers foretelling the end of the world today due to our profligate use of fossil fuels. They will be wrong too. That is my considered opinion based on the success of previous prophets.

Here are some experts who disagree with the other experts.

CRU Director : Warmth Is A Thing Of The Past - ice age coming... this was in 1972



Here is a good one from 1864. Does that one sound familiar? Another Eve of Destruction from the 19th century. Thought it was a more modern concern? We are still here and prospering.

Feynman was an expert on experts.

Phds do not come with a direct line to the truth or a guarantee of infallibility.

Only Mother Nature possesses that degree.

Back in the 1970s the experts thought that global cooling was responsible for bad weather
Today’s experts are more informed and blame bad weather on global warming


Today’s experts know that global warming brings more drought except when it brings a deluge. Governor Perry of Texas knew the rains would return. How come the climate experts didn’t know that?

And how do the general public react when scientists bring to them such conflicting views?

We laugh. We say get back to us when you are all on the same page. We don’t vote on reality. We want to know what it is. Get your ducks in a row before you mouth off and frighten the hell out of us. Stop crying wolf.

Of course, the experts are never wrong. That is why they are experts. Occasionally, they will admit error.
Last time I looked the low lying islands were still above water.
Do experts have a vested interest in alarmist predictions?
Does it bring them notoriety, recognition, invitations and funding? Are they human? Is their profit in being a prophet? Ask Mr Hansen or Mr Gore.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts -- Bertrand Russell

Advance To The Past

The solutions to the alleged problem of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) that are offered by those who believe it is real will re-instate human activities that were passed by or abandoned as society developed. These solutions will take our future back to the past.


See?


Your Future, Courtesy of Climate Activists - fly less, get rid of your refrigerator, shower less and more

Welcome to the dark ages - Britain begins to emulate N. Korea

Switching from coal to wood chips. This one won an award.  For stupidity?

Europe Today: Stealing Wood, Burning Wood - increase price of fossil fuel energy and electricity. People will find a way to keep warm more cheaply.

Please read this next one. From it you will learn what makes our modern society with its current high standard of living possible.


Now that reads like an Al-Qaeda plan for the destruction of the USA without firing a shot. Convince the idiot leaders of the free world to chase a Phantom of the Atmosphere to destroy their economies in the misguided belief that they are saving the planet. Apparently, this is a rather easy goal to accomplish. Meanwhile, others don’t follow suit and ascend the standard of living of their people to the top of the ladder.  

Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Carbon based fuels have been one of the greatest liberators of mankind in the history of our planet'

Now you know why.

Let those who wish to time travel to an imaginary utopian past proceed unhindered. RIP.


Boxer Claim Easy to Make

Climate changes continuously.

Boxer: in a few short years, we can just look out window and see evidence of #climate change all around us”

How do you tell a human induced tornado from a ‘natural’ one?

We often hear her vague claim advanced by alarmists who want us to be frightened of future climate change. Specifics are not forthcoming. They speak as crystal ball gazers who can see the future while the rest of us mortals are to accept their pronouncements without question. Special knowledge from those specially chosen to see the future? Nice con if you can pull it off.

Perhaps Sen. Boxer didn’t get the memo concerning the recall of her crystal ball.

How will the future climate be different from what it is today?
At what level of CO2 will these changes begin to appear?
How will we recognize a hurricane as belonging to the category ‘evidence of climate change all around us”? How will it be different from those of the past or present?
How will the signs show up in the data?

Without answers to these questions how will we recognize a human induced hurricane from a ‘natural’ one?

As CO2 has increased in the air over the last 150 years extreme weather has not increased. We have seen it all before.

In reality Sen Boxer’s crystal ball is her imagination gone wild in defense of the indefensible. She has an agenda(21) to serve and she wants your money.

Blog Archive