The headlines gathered at the website Climate Depot can often be a comedy of contradictions. Everyone seems to have a different idea about what’s happening with the climate. A chaotic non-linear system can do that to people. For instance take this one: Could global warming SAVE mankind? Nuclear winter caused by a natural disaster would be reversed by pumping out greenhouse gases, study claims. So global warming is now a good thing except that it isn’t happening as acknowledged by the unprecedented number of reasons being offered for the ‘pause’ in global warming. New excuse for the ‘pause’ of global warming #58: Colder eastern Pacific and reduced heat loss in other oceans.
But here is another headline, one among many, that regards the global warming that isn’t happening as the most important issue we face as a species. Warmist Phil Plait declares GOP Victory ‘quite literally affects the future of humanity’. But if global warming is such a dangerous condition for the planet then shouldn’t warmists be rejoicing that the planet isn’t warming? But here is USA Today lamenting the fact that the world that hasn’t warmed for 18+ years is in danger of warming out of control. USA Today: ‘World losing battle against global warming’.
So what are we to make of these different viewpoints. One sees GW as our savior and the other sees GW as our funeral director. Weren’t we told 25 years ago that the ‘science is settled’?
With an 18+ year pause it appears that Mother Nature is taking care of the ‘problem’ all by herself much to the chagrin of those of us who would like a little more warmth. Past interglacials have been warmer than the one we currently find ourselves inhabiting and past concentrations of CO2 in the air have been much larger(up to 8000 ppm) than we currently experience so we are in no danger of reaching a tipping point or the planet would have done so already. The theory of greenhouse gas warming lacks any foundation in experience and therefore the theory deserves to be discarded as baseless.
The first headline referenced above is therefore a pipe dream. CO2 emissions could not save us from a ‘nuclear winter’ or an ice age. USA Today is also incorrect in that human emissions of CO2 will not create an oven in which the main course is baked human. Geological history makes that perfectly clear. We are fretting over nothing but why? Contemplate the meaning of the following and the political nature of the issue becomes crystal clear.
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention....and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself....believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or….one invented for the purpose." ~ Club of Rome
The issue of Global Warming/Climate Change has been seized by those of a totalitarian nature who wish to be in charge of resource allocation and ensure their own well-being at the expense of the freedom of others. They have an agenda(21).
Hopefully for the sake of science and common sense this headline at Climate Depot proves correct: Climate Depot’s Marc Morano: ‘The GOP sweep is a victory for science. Obama’s EPA & UN agenda will now face serious setbacks’
No comments:
Post a Comment