Some
people want to believe so desperately that human induced CO2 additions
to the atmosphere are the cause of climate change that they are willing
to ignore reality and say the most stupid things in defense of the cherished meme.
To a scientist reality is her guide. To an activist the agenda is her guide.
Dedication to reality generates a change in course for a scientist when her theory is trumped by Mother Nature. Science says: modify or abandon the theory.
Dedication
to an agenda generates stupidity, tunnel vision and denial when the
agenda is threatened by non-supporting data. Activism says: modify data
and abandon reality.
Originally we were told that global warming will produce warmer weather throughout the year. OK, that seems logical.
Julia Slingo is the current Chief Scientist at the UK Met Office. (April 2013)
Well,
Julia is adaptable but she is really saying that CO2 is so adaptable
that it can produce both warm and cold springs. CO2 is a magic gas that
can perform tricks to produce whatever weather you see outside your
window.
Left
out of the discussion is the exact mechanism by which CO2 manages to
accomplish this feat. How does CO2 choose which trick it is going to
perform in any given year? How can we predict what CO2 will do if we do
not understand the algorithm that CO2 obeys?
Since
there is no way to predict a scenario because there is no algorithm we
might want to entertain the possibility that CO2 has nothing to do with
the weather or the climate and that someone has been peddling snake oil.
Perhaps
this is why we are not served a CO2 index with our nightly weather
forecasts. We receive the humidex, UV index, pollen index and Air
Quality index all of which allow us to prepare for tomorrow’s
atmospheric conditions. But no CO2 index. Isn’t this peculiar since we
are told that CO2 emissions are ruining the planet? Climate change is the most important issue to confront humankind so we are warned. And yet no mention of the controlling factor on our nightly weather reports.
What would a CO2 index tell us? How should we act if CO2 concentration is reported to be 400ppm? Put on your coat? Not wear a coat? Bring an umbrella? It tells us nothing.
Could that be a clue that CO2 has nothing to do with the weather or the climate?
Climate alarmists are making a big deal out of the fact that we may soon pass 400ppm in CO2 concentration. So what? Can we expect another Sandy the day after that great milestone?
Will we break the world record for maximum temperature that was set in
Death Valley, CA on July 10, 1913? Will we be covered in snow by a May
blizzard?
CO2 has been exhaled during the creation of this post. No living thing was harmed. Some even liked it.
No comments:
Post a Comment