Some species, such as Smith's dwarf chameleon, adjust their colors for camouflage in accordance with the vision of the specific predator species (bird or snake) by which they are being threatened.
AGW has chameleon abilities to adapt to the criticism of those skeptical of the CO2 centric theory of global warming to extend its life.
When the theory is advertised as an Arctic sea ice melter and yet the ice continues to survive its ‘expiration date the date is simply pushed out further into the future. How many failures will it take before doubt about the validity of the theory begins to incubate?
When the theory is advertised as a polar bear population reduction machine but polar bear populations increase even as sea ice decreases how long before capitulation by the theory. promoters?
When the theory is advertised as snow melt and yet snow continues to fall and the snow cover extent continues to increase in winter even as CO2 continues to increase unabated in the atmosphere how long before rational scientists should admit there is a problem with the theory?
When the theory predicts a world with warming winters but cold winters continue to appear even as CO2 continues to increase unabated in the atmosphere how long before rational scientists begin to look for alternative explanations for the observations?
Trying to disguise the cold as a manifestation of warming is a lot like a chameleon changing its colors to hide from its enemies.
Can you see me now?
How about now?
No comments:
Post a Comment