It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Friday, December 18, 2015

Why is There More Than One?


And why do they not agree with one another? What do we really know?

Temperature data is not a computer program. Why does it need a version? Is the next version the new and improved data? 30C wasn’t 30C in the past? By what algorithms do they adjust past and present data? Do we not know what today’s temperatures are? We will have to wait a decade to find out the adjusted temps for today? Anyone smell a  rat?

Apparently, the past is malleable, especially if it does not support the global warming hysteria.

Why is there more than one global climate model? Why don’t they agree with one another?

Because the science is settled. Because basic physics.

If scientists cannot agree on what data is correct then the science is definitely NOT settled.

Newsflash from the Mother Nature Climate Network:










No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive