Personally, I prefer the skeptic side of the debate on man made global warming. The news is so much better. Compare and contrast.
Let’s zoom in on the boom in doom and gloom on the alarmist side of the ledger.
‘Warmer temperatures may cause more girl births’ – ‘New study forewarns an unexpected effect of climate change: more girl births than boy births’ - Being male I am not so sure this is a bad thing.
Turn your thermostats down and help save planet, UK elderly told - sacrifice required
California’s Cap-and-Trade to increase gas prices up to a dollar per gallon starting January 2015 - more sacrifice
Over in the skeptic camp they are wondering what all the fuss is about. The more warmists go hysterical the better the world gets. Should we thank them? Is it cause and effect? CO2 appears to be a barometer of human wellness. The more there is the better off we are.
Newly-recovered 1969 Arctic satellite data shows ice-free hole 200-300 miles wide – ‘We found holes in ice at North Pole that we didn’t expect to find” - it has happened before
No shrinking goats or giant man eating snakes on the skeptic side. My choice is made. The alarmists are delusional econuts. After all, when have the Harold Campings of the world ever been right? Quoting the ‘Be Happy’ article above:
“Since the Little Ice Age (LIA), the world has been warming. It will continue to do so. Thus, we are going to keep experiencing warm(er) and warm(est) events - it's a no-brainer due to natural warming rebound. It will only stop happening when the world enters another mini ice age or worse. Those are the stubborn facts, which essentially makes CO2's trivial influence irrelevant.”
Hakuna matata!
No comments:
Post a Comment