It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

There's A Hole In Our Blanket

Jan - April 2012 was about 5.5°F warmer than this year.

Year-to-Date (Jan-Apr), rankings of 2013 is number 9 coldest since 1979 (n=35) -- on par w/1983, 1997, 2011.

Including March & April together, CONUS was 44.4°F in 2013, about 2.5°F below last-30 yr average, coldest since 1996 pic.twitter.com/qAc644qXKn

March to May temperatures in the US have been on the decline since 1985. 2012 was an anomaly that blasted the alarmists off to Planet Hysteria.

From the beginning 2012 was hotter than 2013. This means that CO2 was unable to retain the heat. CAGW is in big trouble as its main tenet has been invalidated by reality.

Over the last year US temperatures have dropped 3 degrees. CO2 was unable to trap the heat from the hottest year evah?

Is it broken? Did it go on strike? Perhaps it hopped the jet stream to a warmer clime? Does it only trap heat in the summer?

Is there a hole in the Earth’s CO2 blanket that needs mending? Do we need a higher thread count?

There’s a hole in our blanket, our blanket, our blanket.
There’s a hole in our blanket, in our blanket, a hole.

CO2 is so adaptable that it can produce both warm and cold springs. CO2 is a magic gas that can perform tricks to produce whatever weather you see outside your window.

Left out of the discussion is the exact mechanism by which CO2 manages to accomplish this feat. How does CO2 choose which trick it is going to perform in any given year? How can we predict what CO2 will do if we do not understand the algorithm that CO2 obeys?

Since there is no way to predict a scenario because there is no algorithm we might want to entertain the possibility that CO2 has nothing to do with the weather or the climate and that someone has been peddling snake oil.

Perhaps this is why we are not served a CO2 index with our nightly weather forecasts. We receive the humidex, UV index, pollen index and Air Quality index all of which allow us to prepare for tomorrow’s atmospheric conditions. But no CO2 index. Isn’t this peculiar since we are told that CO2 emissions are ruining the planet? Climate change is the most important issue to confront humankind so we are warned. And yet no mention of the controlling factor on our nightly weather reports.

What would a CO2 index tell us? How should we act if CO2 concentration is reported to be 400ppm? Put on your coat? Not wear a coat? Bring an umbrella? It tells us nothing.

Could that be a clue that CO2 has nothing to do with the temperature, the weather or the climate?

How do alarmists explain the lack of heat trapping by the increasing amounts of CO2 that we terrible humans are putting into the atmosphere? 2012 was a very hot year. Alarmists in the press and on TV were screaming about global warming as temperatures climbed into 3 digits during the heat wave. And yet as 2012 progressed the heat disappeared and we experienced a very long, cold and snowy winter with a very cool 2013 spring. And while all this was going on CO2 continued to accumulate in the atmosphere to the point where it is nearing 400 ppm which alarmists will be quick to tell you is unprecedented in human existence. And still it couldn’t retain even some of the summer 2012 heat. Does this raise the question about the mechanism by which CO2 ‘decides’ to retain heat or to let it escape? How can we predict from year to year which CO2 will ‘choose’ to do? Are there other factors in play that we need to be aware of?

Shouldn't’ we have expected a warmer than normal winter with less snow than usual? Isn’t that what ‘trapping heat’ means? Isn’t that what GHGs are good at? And yet it didn’t happen. Where did the heat go? How did the Earth’s atmosphere manage to vent all that heat? How did it get around the heat trapping ability of CO2?

Well?

When Mother Nature gives your theory of heat retention the finger science says: modify or abandon the theory.

The summer heat of 2012 was not trapped. The fall, winter and spring of 2012-2013 did not warm up to the same degree as the previous year. Did the winter and spring of 2013 not receive the same amount of energy as was present in the winter and spring of 2012? Why not? Is it not relevant to the issue of climate change to know what is going on here? Same sun, same time of year, more CO2 in the air, same energy coming in and yet a different and cooler temperature. We know the answer to this and it has nothing to do with CO2 and everything to do with where the air masses are coming from. We live in a non-linear, chaotic atmosphere and the winds change from hour to hour, day to day, week to week, month to month, season to season and year to year. Why should we expect a mild winter just because we had a hot summer?

Heat rises and the atmosphere vents.

Al Gore has missed the memo as he still goes around the country preaching the same sermon of global doom if we don’t cut human emissions of CO2, leave oil in the ground and switch to renewable energy.

He hasn’t noticed that Mother Nature has made him irrelevant. His hypocrisy is an assistant in that regard. Al is a modern day snake oil salesman with the elixir to fix all that ails us. Al’s ‘solution’ to our problems is to advance us to the past from which we came - a past without fossil fuels where poverty reigned - think horse and buggy. He wants to reacquaint us with our Neanderthal ancestors while he and his ilk continue to enjoy the privileged lifestyle of the rich and famous. It is time to run Al out of town and keep using our elixir of fossil fuels because CO2 is not a problem that needs fixing.

We know that CO2 does good things for us as it is an integral part of photosynthesis that helps to feeds us. CO2 has been miscast as a demon of the atmosphere when in fact it plays a starring role and wears a white hat. There is no CO2 blanket in the atmosphere. CO2 has nothing to do with the temperature, the weather or the climate. And that is Mother Nature talking.

We owe CO2 an apology.

CO2, a trace gas essential to life on Earth, is plant food. We exhale CO2 and help to feed the flora. In return they slip us oxygen, of which we have become rather fond, in a mutually beneficial and amicable symbiotic relationship.

Apart from that CO2 has no redeeming features

We need to stop all activities aimed at decreasing human emissions of CO2.

CO2 is green. We need more of it not less. CO2 has been exhaled during the creation of this post. No living thing was harmed. Some even liked it. Let the plants dance.

h/t Tom Nelson

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive