It is no longer global warming because it isn't.

It is climate change because it does.

Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.

— Thomas B. Macaulay (1800-1859), Essay on Southey's Colloquies

All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.


About Me

My photo
Copyright Notice © JLS and LensFocus, 2008-present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to JLS and LensFocus with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Questions for CAGW alarmists

What would convince you that CAGW was not really happening?

How would you determine that a new Ice Age was in progress?

What would convince you the CO2 had nothing to do with a warming trend?

At the Summit Station in Greenland they built the Big House on stilts.I will leave it to you to ascertain the reason for this. In the last 30 years of global warming how many times have they had to lower the Big House to grade? A hint is provided here.

What should the average temperature of the Earth be and why?

How much CO2 in ppm should be in our atmosphere and how did you arrive at this number?

What would convince you that something is not unprecedented?

What would convince you that something is not unequivocal?

Why do some humans try to scare other humans?

How many doomsday scenarios of the  past do you know that have been actualized? How many times in the past have humans destroyed the Earth?

Why do you think that is?

And how many times in the past, because of false beliefs, have humans engaged in practices that have been harmful to themselves rather than the Earth? Humans hurting other humans by their dedication to dogma and the demonisation of those who disagree with them has a long and macabre history.

And in the case of CO2, are we more likely to harm ourselves by policies that attempt to reduce our CO2 emissions or are we more likely to successfully control the climate by such policies?

What will be the effect of carbon reduction policies on the poor people of the world? 

If bad weather has happened in the past when CO2 was lower and bad weather is happening today when CO2 is higher do you really think there is a connection between the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and the weather?

Do you really think that humans know how to prevent tornadoes? Will less CO2 in the atmosphere really produce fewer tornadoes? Will global warming produce more tornadoes?

Is it more likely that CO2 reduction policies are meant to serve another agenda or that they are really aimed at controlling the climate?

 Do you think that celebrities, politicians and other high profile individuals who want you to reduce your carbon footprint will lead by example?

Are they?

Continue to burn incandescent light bulbs, turn up the A/C in summer, stay warm in winter and drive your SUV without guilt for CO2 is a harmless trace gas essential to life on earth. It is not a pollutant but a plant fertilizer. Demand the deregulation and privatization of electricity from your governments as your protection against central control of the electrical grid and your life. Let the market decide.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive