“I think climate science is rather straightforward because you’re dealing with the earth, it’s a rock…climate scientists, from the very beginning, have pretty much said the same thing, and their predictions have pretty much come true. It’s atmospherics, and it’s geology, and chemistry.”
What do solar scientists say is coming Bill? They have input on climate science as well. Climate scientists don’t all say the same thing. What you have missed Bill is that the skepticism about man made climate change is expressed in the blogosphere where independent unpaid truthseekers toil away at the same data as the government paid climate scientists and come to different conclusions. And many of them are scientists working in the field or have worked in the field.
Here is the IPCC in their 2001 TAR about atmospherics.
” … In climate research and modelling, we should recognise that we are dealing
with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the
long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”
From the 3rd IPCC report, Section 14.2 “The Climate System”, page 774.
Do chaos theory scientists still agree?
Here is what geologists have discovered about temperature and CO2 in our past.
No correlation Bill. No correlation no causation Bill. WIth CO2 at higher levels in our atmosphere throughout most of the last 600 million years there was no tipping point, no runaway global warming and we are worried about 400 ppm? CO2 up over the last 18+ years but not temperature. Global climate models predict warmer than reality delivers and you say “climate science is rather straightforward”? Gimme a break.
You say “their predictions have pretty much come true”. Really? Do a little research Bill. Don’t believe everything you are told or hear via the MSM. You would be surprised at how often they are wrong. It has been documented Bill. Aren’t skeptics helpful? We educate.
Read it, Bill. Take time to educate yourself then take time to reflect on your breathtaking ignorance on the subject of climate change.
Ever had to admit you were wrong Bill? Good time to start. Man up!
Look at this one Bill:
Were the scientists, who pretty much say the same thing and whose predictions pretty much have come true, correct on this one? They missed both the 25 and 50 year prediction but they now know what it will be like in 2100? My you are gullible Bill.
Maher:
“the ones who are skeptics [on climate change], usually are paid off by the oil industry.” Maher then complained about “this era we live in, where we can’t ask any questions.”
So, Bill are CO2 centric climate change skeptics allowed to ask questions or should they complain about “this era we live in, where we can’t ask any questions.” Sauce for the gander, buddy!
Proof of oil support for skeptics, Bill? Got any?
Climate changes continuously Bill, because it is a cyclical phenomenon. No news there. And CO2 has nothing to do with it. That is why we are not served a CO2 index with our nightly weather forecast. There will be 400 ppm CO2 in the air tomorrow. Uh-huh and....? No matter what the temp or what the weather there will be 400 ppm in the air tomorrow. CO2 concentration tells us nothing about the weather and therefore it tells us nothing about the climate either. Isn’t climate just the 30 year average of the weather?
No comments:
Post a Comment