This is hilarious and makes a mockery of the 'settled science' claims of the CAGW crowd. It is nice to see such agreement among the climate 'experts' of the day. They need to have a huddle to get their stories straight. Should they vote? How will they determine which area is to be hardest hit? Perhaps a game of 'survivor' to see who will be the 'sole survivor' in the 'we are to be the hardest hit area' due to CO2 induced climate change. And the multi-billion dollars goes to... Survey says....
Imagine the dilemma faced by contestants on the show Jeopardy. Which area of the world will be hardest hit by climate change? Any answer would be correct according to the present state of the 'settled science'.
What a joke these experts are! Let's invite them to debate the topic. I'll get the popcorn. That should be some funny show. Trouble is they would probably completely miss the satirical nature of the debate.
When a $100 billion climate fund is up for grabs many will plead their case of hardship. Each area will detail its disasters and try to point out the weaknesses in the case for any other area being the hardest hit by CAGW. Pretty soon they will all begin attacking each others pleas by pointing out the weather disasters of the past and slowly begin to realise that there are cyclical patterns which undermines not only the hardship case presented by their neighbor but their own as well. A consensus will be reached.
Change is what the climate does. And the change is cyclical which a recognition of past ice age eras and interglacials should have made apparent to them long before now. CO2 as the modern day 'Salem witch' will fade into the annals of human ignorance (hysteria) and die from neglect and no doubt out of the decay will arise the next great environmental crusade which this time will allow Pinky and The Brain to take over the world.
Perhaps skeptics will be better prepared to derail the plans of Pinky and TheBrain to blame humans for the new perceived evil.
No comments:
Post a Comment